BWC Sustainability score: Currently no score.
Below you can read some key data on Campeon Gaming. However since this company currently only operates casinos and sportsbook sites under Maltese and Curacao licenses, it is currently not on my list of operators to review since it’s now allowed to operate in the UK.
The initial review of Campeón Gaming is based on their website which we visited in August 2022. Unfortunately due to the fact that Campeón Gaming is a small private company, they are not obliged to publish annual reports and neither do they provide much information voluntarily.
“Built by passionate, creative people with deep industry insights,
our brands offer a plethora of enticing games, cutting-edge design and player engagement.”
(source: https://www.campeongaming.com/affiliates/)
Casinos from Campeón Gaming
Campeon Gaming has no UK licensed brands.
One day
there will be 5 star rated casino
- Company type: Steward Ownership
- Launch year: 2000
- License: all regulated markets
- 24/7 support: live chat, telephone call back & email
- Only from software providers that have also earned a 5 star rating
- Type of games: Slots, table games, live casino, pokerrooms, bingo halls
- Providers: only the ones that have also adopted ESG leadership strategy
- All payment providers that show they work actively towards SDG & ESG
- NO withdrawal limits
The company
Campeón Gaming is a relatively new and small i-gaming operator and affiliate network, founded in 2017. Their current headquarters are in Malta, although operations seems to be purely based in Greece, with a team of just over 50. They currently offer 11 brands with another 2 coming soon.
ESG
The only mention of anything related to ESG is that they are “CGP Certified as Best Place to Work 2021”. We have verified that they are indeed certified until December 2022 by greatplacetowork.com.
When it comes to any other aspect of sustainability, we have not been able to find anything on their website or elsewhere.
Conclusions & Rating
Although a private company is not obliged to communicate or report on many aspects of their business, this doesn’t mean they couldn’t or shouldn’t do so anyway.
At this moment we can only assign them minimal points for obtaining their “Best Place to Work” certificate. As for all other matters, we assume them to be non-existent, for otherwise, they would have taken the opportunity to promote themselves as a sustainable company.
For these reasons, our current verdict cannot be higher than a 2 out of 5 rating.
